The most appropriate word to describe relations between NGOs and the State would be "reserved." Public officials do not have a particular prejudice against NGOs. On the contrary, their attitude is rather generous. However, they are somewhat skeptical with respect to the possible benefits of these organizations.

The problem is that such officials, having worked for many years in government administration under Communism (this is the case for the majority of the professionals in the ministries and other central government entities), generally find it difficult to accept that an organization can exist and function independently of the State.

Likewise, NGOs exhibit a basic mistrust of and a tendency to avoid communication with the state administration. NGOs will have to break the communications barrier. The experiences of those who have tried to do so are in harmony with this observation: public institutions are often inefficient, but generally speaking, public officials can be found who wish to support a meaningful activity.

The linkages of many NGOs with the state are stronger than many NGO representatives may realize. Several statements made at the Stupava Conference seemed to anticipate a time when the state will be responsible for subsidizing NGO activities.

It will not be easy to overcome these and other illusions in a country with such a deeply rooted tradition of state paternalism, or instill the understanding that the most important task of the state in terms of NGOs is to create an appropriate legal framework for the development of the third sector.